It is how we look at it...

Sometimes, I just wonder if our mind "deliberately" choose to ignore some information simply because they "aren't music to our ears"?


Picked up these copies of free dailies at the train stations while on my way to work.

The front most is published by what the netizens labelled as by those "pro-gahmen" publishers.

While the broadsheet behind is somehow being defined as the "alternative-opined" (which I would rather labelled that as).

For those who read both publications may shared the same sentiment that one's content tend to be on the moderate side, while the other would see itself as the "auditor" of the establishment or sort.

There's no doubt that in the present time when information are spread and share in matter of seconds through the means of cyberspace, it's pretty hard to deny some stark facts from filtered out (i.e.: Wikileaks).

However, what holds the key is when how each individual and eventually a sizable group's reception to a piece of information that present to them that how they decipher the content of it will determine how a popular opinion is formed in the end.

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone